This
is a greatly expanded version of my March 2003
Traditional Quiltworks
magazine article.
Comments? Queries? Email me by clicking here.
|
SUMMARY
The
premise of the "Quilt Code" is that various
geometric patterns commonly found in American patchwork
quilts were used to convey messages in connection with the
Underground Railroad. But even among Code proponents, the
patterns’ meanings, how the quilts were used, and who used
them is a matter of debate: as of mid-2005 at least 15
contradictory versions of the Code were circulating.
Some proponents claim the Code as part of their family oral
history, but none can point to an ancestor who used it
to escape to the North or even participated in the
Underground Railroad.
Firsthand accounts of
fugitive slaves and Underground Railroad participants detail
many ways of conveying messages but never mention using
quilts, and the details of the Code are incompatible
with documented evidence of the Underground Railroad,
slave living conditions, quiltmaking, and African
culture. For example, the Code includes quilt patterns
known to have originated in the 1930s, and while Code
proponents say certain patterns are derived from African
symbols, the messages the Code assigns to them conflict with
the meanings the symbols have in Africa.
Along with many other
myths involving quilts and subcultures (such as the Amish),
the Code materialized in the 1980s during the
post-Bicentennial revival of folk art, the popularization of
women’s history studies, and Western notions of African
culture comparable to early Hollywood depictions of
Native Americans. The earliest mention of a "quilt
code" is a brief statement in a 1987 feminist
video: quilts were hung outside Underground
Railroad safe houses. (No source is given for the assertion
and it is conspicuously absent from the companion book.) In
1993 a white Massachusetts woman elaborated on the Code idea
in Sweet Clara and the Freedom Quilt, a children’s fiction
book; its heroine makes a quilt containing a topographical
map she uses to escape from slavery.
Not long after Sweet Clara
was published, Ozella Williams, a retired California school
administrator, used her own version of a "quilt
code" to sell quilts in a Charleston, South Carolina
tourist mall. One of her customers was Jacqueline Tobin, a
white instructor in "women’s words," who
unsuccessfully pressed Williams for details. When Williams
refused to return Tobin’s phone calls, Tobin visited Williams unannounced and "coaxed" the
elderly woman to reveal the Code to her. The resulting
book,
Hidden In Plain View, was published after Williams's death,
and was promoted by Oprah Winfrey and quilt shop owners,
who produced Code quilt kits for the multibillion-dollar
quilters market, and by antique dealers who used the Code as a
marketing tool. Williams’s family members developed a
cottage industry lecturing on the Code and selling related
merchandise. Although no historian has ever supported the
Code, by 2001 elementary and secondary schools were teaching
it as historical fact. But after scholars pointed out numerous
discrepancies between the Code and documented Underground
Railroad history, earlier supporters of the Code began
distancing themselves from its claims. Tobin herself has since
complained that "people have tried to push the book in
directions that it was not meant for," and when Dobard
was asked in 2009 where his book should appear on library
shelves, he said "somewhere between fact and
fiction."
|
For
easier navigation and faster loading, I've divided this article into
sections.
To
navigate, you can use the "contents" links below, or
simply click the link at the bottom of this page to continue reading.
Introduction
In 1999, Random House publishing subsidiary Doubleday, known for its popular fiction and "lite" nonfiction, announced the release of a remarkable new
book by Jacqueline Tobin and Raymond Dobard. Half a dozen years earlier, Tobin wrote, she had
been approached by an elderly black woman in Charleston, South
Carolina with a surprising story: during the half century before
the Civil War, quilts had been used by African-Americans as a
means of conveying messages concerning escape on the Underground
Railroad. Not surprisingly, the "Underground Railroad Quilt
Code," as it came to be known, quickly captured the popular
imagination: for generations, a secret code originating in Africa
had been "hidden in plain view" in everyday quilts!
Quilt stores now sell "Code" books, tour guides and
antique dealers use the "Code" to sell antiques, and
educators struggling to make sense of Black History Month use
"Code" storybooks to teach variations of the story to
children in Social Studies classes.
Meanwhile, professional historians and an increasingly vocal
group of laymen and women - students of quilt history and the
history of African-Americans - have decried the "Quilt
Code" as without factual basis, accusing its proponents of
sloppy scholarship at best and sheer hucksterism at worst. They
wonder why none of the people asserting they learned the
"Code" from family oral history claims a single ancestor
who actually escaped North. And they complain that just as the
history of African-Americans had gained acceptance as worthy of
serious study, documented stories of black accomplishments and
heroism were being ignored in favor of a convenient pop-culture
tale whose dubiousness insults the very culture it ostensibly
celebrates.
Which view is correct? Does the "Underground Railroad
Quilt Code" have any basis in fact?
In the years since the
publication of Hidden in Plain View this writer has studied
the "Quilt Code" in depth. Research included
conversations with Serena Wilson, niece of Ozella Williams, and
lengthy correspondence with Teresa Kemp, Wilson’s daughter, who
also promotes the "Quilt Code". I was disappointed that
although her emails to me totaled more than 6,000 words, and she
not only repeatedly stated that she wanted to answer in detail any
questions I had but offered to send me documentary evidence she
said her family had kept for generations, when I sent her specific
questions regarding the individual quilt blocks described below,
Kemp’s emails to me abruptly stopped.
In late July 2004 Kemp again made contact with me, blaming a
computer virus for her two-year silence. Over a period of about 10
days she sent me another dozen emails totaling another 3,000
words, none of which answered any of my questions about the
"Quilt Code". She did, however, make a number of new
claims, including that the Daughters of the Confederacy are
somehow behind objections to the "Quilt Code" myth, and
that historians reject the "Quilt Code" because they
"did not bother to check or get other information".
As she did in 2002, Kemp repeatedly promised to answer specific
questions I sent her about the "Quilt Code". She even
agreed to send me copies of the evidence she claims to have
unearthed. She never sent me anything, nor did she ever reply to
follow-up emails asking for their whereabouts. But while Kemp may
have abandoned her correspondence with me, she continues to send
out notices of lectures and other appearances, and applied for a
Federal government grant to teach the "Code". In 2005
she announced she had opened a "museum" in
the Underground Atlanta district ($8 admission), which also sold
quilts. In 2006 she complained to a sympathetic blogger that
she could not seem to attract much attention from
African-Americans; as elsewhere, most of those interested in
the "quilt code" story were white. Despite its
location in a high-traffic shopping area, by mid-2007 the
"museum" had closed for lack of business, and its plantationquilts.com
website had been shut down.
The
"Quilt Code" timeline
The first mention I have found
of a "Quilt Code" - the idea that quilts were somehow
used as signals by or for escaped slaves in connection with the
Underground Railroad - is a single line in the voiceover narrative
for Hearts
and Hands, a 1987 video about women and quilts by
feminists Pat Ferrera and Elaine Hedges:
They say quilts were
hung on the clotheslines to signal a house was safe for runaway
slaves.
Strangely, the companion book, coauthored by Julie Silber, contains no such statement.
I wrote the film production company for information on the
source of this claim, but did not receive a response. In
late 2005 I located the filmmaker's original research file, and
obtained copies of the folders relating to abolition, the Civil
War, and African-Americans. I found nothing on quilts as
signals; however, among the correspondence was a letter
expressing concern about the script's historical accuracy.
Other parts of Hearts and Hands
have come into
question. Ellie Sienkewicz, regarded as the leading expert on
the history of Baltimore Album quilts, noted in 1989 that the
book cites two credible historians for its confident, detailed
history of Mary Ann Evans's significant contribution to the
design of such quilts. Sothebys relied on the book's assertions
to attribute three quilts to Evans; each sold for a small
fortune. But Sienkewicz points out that the book
mischaracterizes its sources: where Hearts and Hands is
unequivocal, they are only tentative, and the conclusions one
does make are unsupported by simple math. Concludes Sienkewicz,
the authors of Hearts and Hands are among those who have transmuted "theory into fact." (For more on this book, click here.)
In
1989, folklorist Gladys-Marie Fry curated an exhibit of
African-American quilts, Stitched from the Soul: Slave
Quilts of the Ante-Bellum South. (Despite its title, almost
all of the quilts in the exhibit date from well after the
Civil War; several are from after 1940.) Fry’s
account elaborates on the claim in Hearts and Hands:
Quilts were
used to send messages. On the Underground Railroad, those
with the color black were hung on the line to indicate a
place of refuge (safe house)...Triangles in quilt design
signified prayer messages or prayer badge, a way of
offering prayer. Colors were very important to slave quilt
makers. The color black indicated that someone might die.
A blue color was believed to protect the maker.
Fry's
book is peppered with footnotes, but she provides no source for
this remarkable statement which, as far as I have been able to
find, is the first time such a claim ever appeared in print. (For more on Fry, click
here.)
A seminar
was held in connection with Fry's exhibit. Jonathan
Holstein recalls quilt historian Cuesta Benberry's
reaction to the seminar's presentations: the
"main road", said Benberry, of African-American
quiltmakers was being ignored in favor of what Holstein calls
"an attempt to define African-American quilts using small
samplings of specific times, areas, or groups" resulting in a
distorted, stereotyped understanding that was "ill-advised at
best and unconsciously racist at worst" and which "has
led to some major scholarship disasters".
Though
there has always been an unfortunate mixture of fact, myth and
speculation in some quilt writing and scholarship, it has been
particularly evident in discussions of African-American quilts.
There, the mixture has functioned as a dangerous substitute for
missing history. This too has led to some recent fiascos of
scholarship.
- Abstract
Design in American Quilts: A Biography of an Exhibition (1991)
Benberry
attempted to correct what she called "erroneous
assumptions" with another, scholarly exhibit, Always
There: The African-American Presence in American Quilts, which
celebrated the wide variety of styles shown in the quilts of
black women. In her introduction to the companion book,
Benberry points out that many stories about quilts are the product of
"overactive imaginations," and notes:
A story,
as yet undocumented, tells of quilts in the "Jacob's
Ladder" pattern (renamed "Underground Railroad")
hung outside houses as a signal to passengers on the Underground
Railroad that the homes were safe havens for the fearful
travelers.
In her companion book, Benberry compares the 1980s explosion of interest in
African-American quilts to the 1970s craze for
Amish quilts. She notes the influence of Afrocentrism and of
Women's Studies programs in the last decades of the 20th
century, and observes with dismay the rapid development of
pop-culture assumptions about African-American quilts and
their makers:
African-American
quilts became one of America's newest forms of
exotica. Continued scrutiny of [a small group of
African-American quilts whose style was outside the
traditional American quilt aesthetic] resulted in the
promulgation of a number of theories which were
immediately accepted as fact....Long established canons of
quilt history research...were no longer deemed
essential.
Such
an extremely myopic view of African-American quilts made many
scholars of black history and quilt history researchers
uneasy....[Q]uilt historians realized findings gathered in these
early studies of black-made quilts had been extrapolated far
beyond what the evidence would legitimately support.
Unfortunately,
such premature assumptions have been made and have gained wide
credence....[m]any persons have accepted the erroneous
assumptions of these skewed studies and are certain they can
identify African-American quilts on sight. They are often
wrong but never in doubt.
In other
words, at the same time stereotypes about black people
were ostensibly being abandoned, stereotypes about their quilts
(and thus their makers' individuality) were becoming
entrenched.
Such warnings went unheeded. The next year,
Maude Wahlman published Signs and Symbols: African Images in
African-American Quilts. The book had originated as a thesis and was also published in 1987 as a journal article. Of
the five thousand slides of African-American quilts and their
makers Wahlman claims to own, as evidence she selects only
103 quilts made by two dozen quilters. Ninety percent
date from the 1980s birth of the "art quilt"
(which have been described as "paintings" made of
fabric and found objects such as beads, feathers and wire)
and the post-Civil Rights Movement revival of interest in
African culture.
Using the very criteria and methodology Benberry had only recently described as "myopic," Wahlman claims to find in these quilts specific African "signs and
symbols" which black Americans somehow passed down through
ten generations. This comes as a surprise to the few
nonprofessional quilters in her book. Blissfully unaware of
the hidden messages in their quilts, until Wahlman enlightens them
they think they are just being creative. (Some, like Charlie
Logan, sound insulted by Wahlman's assertions: "I taught
myself. It doesn't mean anything.") Wahlman pointedly ignores the meanings these artists give their creations, and decides on other, subconscious motivations, most of which relate somehow to voodoo. Wahlman sets the stage for the notion that
African-American quilts are full of hidden meaning, and also suggests quilts may have been used as escape signals. She gives no details. (For more on
Wahlman, click here.)
Signs & Symbols
was
followed by a rash of children’s storybooks asserting various
connections between quilts and the Underground Railroad.
The first,
published in 1992, was written by one of the "fiber
artists" in Wahlman’s book. In
Faith Ringgold's Aunt Harriet's Underground Railroad
Quilt in the Sky, two children encounter the spirit of
Harriet Tubman. She soars with them through the night
sky, explaining that every 100 years a railroad train made
of stars traces the path she took as she led runaway slaves
to freedom." Ringgold's book tells the fugitive to look for a house with a quilt
"flung on the roof. If you don't see the quilt, hide in
the woods until it appears." In other words, a
particular house is to be located by a sign that isn’t
there.
By
far the most well-known of the "Quilt Code"
children's books is Sweet Clara and the Freedom Quilt, published
in 1993. Four years earlier, author Deborah Hopkinson heard
a short radio story about an "art quilt" exhibit including the work of Elizabeth Scott, celebrated for her
contributions as a pioneer in that field. Among the
mixed-media quilts in the exhibit was one by Scott entitled
"Plantation
Quilt," randomly covered
with appliqué stars. The artist herself never mentions a
"code", or any use of quilts in connection with
escape, but Hopkinson’s title character, a young slave,
makes a quilt that is literally a map of the area
surrounding the plantation where she lives, which she then uses to escape.
Hopkinson
says she also used Stitched from the Soul as her source, but has
repeatedly stated the book is fiction. But it feels real -
so real, in fact, one scholarly
journal celebrates the author as an "African-American
writer who employ[s] the quilt as a symbol of resistance to
control and dominance" in whose book "cultural identity
is created by the symbolic tradition of the quilt and its
representation of Afrocentric motherhood". Hopkinson
describes herself as "an Irish girl from Lowell
[Massachusetts}. For more on Sweet Clara and its inspiration, click
here.
Benberry
and others had cautioned that
a
procedure in which the quilts from a small group of black
quiltmakers from a limited time frame are selected, examined for
common characteristics, conclusions reached, interpretations
devised, and extrapolations from these made to all
African-American quilts of all times, is at odds with the accepted
method of historical inquiry.
She warned
that without careful, methodical investigation, "a too-hasty,
anachronistic interpretation" would be reached. Yet less than
a decade after their first mention in 1987's Hearts and Hands,
an entire pop-culture mythology had been created around
African-American quilts.
Sandra K.
German was a founder of the Women of Color Quilters Network. In the
1993 issue of the American Quilt Study Group journal Uncoverings, German quotes cofounder Carolyn
Mazloomi regarding the impact of one such exhibit, organized by
collector Eli Leon:
"I
was on fire [says Mazloomi] to hear about the history - the rich
history - of African American quiltmaking...Instead, when we went
to see the show at the museum, one of the first things I noticed
was that the quilts in Eli Leon's collection were very much
unlike my own, or those of the other women of AAQLA [African American Quilters of Los Angeles]....Then we
viewed the faces of a group of white [quilters]...It was as if
they were asking whether all African American quilters produced
only the seemingly haphazard, irregular and impromptu-style
quilts portrayed in the show." The answer was
clear...The encounter left her with....a lasting suspicion as to
the validity of that show, its claims, and its ramifications for
the future of African American quiltmaking. The Network
founders wholly rejected the assertions of Leon and his
contingent.
German quotes
cofounder Melodye Boyd's recollection of a conversation with the
Baltimore Arts Council:
She was
interested in displaying quilts made by Afro-American quilters,
but only those made in the "traditional" style or
where those quilts that are made in the Euro-American style
clearly show the influence of the "traditional" style.
And German herself
recalls the group's 1993 efforts
...to
have our work juried into an important show of African American
folk art. Slide submissions were reviewed and, not
surprisingly, rejected. As with many such experiences,
some of the jurors had adopted the mistaken and misguided
criteria advanced by [Eli] Leon and others - to the exclusion of
all else. Sadly, the sting of this rejection was made even more
excruciating when we later learned that the esteemed but
erroneous jurors were themselves African American. Of the
dozens of people of color who submitted work, only one
aspirant's work was selected because it was stereotypically
"African American."
The genesis of Hidden in Plain View
In 1993 Jacqueline
Tobin, a former therapist who taught writing, women's history and
"women's words" at a Denver college, was
wandering a Charleston, South Carolina tourist mall in search of
information about baskets. Tobin had recently coauthored The Tao of Women with sociology professor and New Age author Pamela Metz, whose The Tao of... books include Calm, Loss and Grief, Learning, Gardening, and Travel. Although The
Tao of Women claims that "in 1950, a secret woman's writing was discovered near Hunan, China", anthropologists and linguists point out that
nu shu was
actually a simplified adaptation of standard Chinese writing, and that it was not "secret"; men had simply ignored it as unimportant.
The proprietor of one Charleston Market stall was Ozella McDaniel
Williams, a 70-ish Howard University
graduate and former school administrator now in the business of
selling quilts. Ozella (as Tobin later refers to her) was dressed in "brightly colored, geometrically patterned African garb," and called Tobin over to tell her a fascinating story: her mother had
taught her that specific block patterns in quilts had been used by
African-American slaves in connection with escape
North. Ozella said that although she had been telling her story for
years, none in the African-American community either believed or
corroborated it. Tobin bought one of Ozella's quilts, took a brochure with her phone number, and went back home to finish her basket story.
Months later, Tobin decided to phone Ozella for more information about the "Code". But although she had approached Tobin with the story in the first place and provided her phone number, Ozella
suddenly refused to talk.
This, says Tobin, "added an element of intrigue" to the story". She was "hooked".
Tobin contacted art history professor Raymond Dobard, hoping Dobard's race (and possibly his Howard connection) would
induce Ozella to be more forthcoming with him than she had been
with Tobin. Dobard declined, but suggested Tobin pursue the issue,
since "[w]e’ve all been waiting and hoping to find a
Code".
Tobin spent the next three years looking for information about the Quilt Code. She says she "traveled down the Mississippi from St. Louis to New Orleans" (odd, since that was the western border of the slave
states, and as far east from Ozella's Charleston as possible) but nobody she consulted could give her any information about it. She could find no
slave-made quilts containing one. Eventually she went back to Charleston. First, she says, she "immersed herself in the flavor of the Old South" by taking a carriage ride. Then she showed up at Ozella's uninvited, and somehow prevailed upon her to reveal
the Code. Tobin was "no longer the journalist in search of a story"; she was "taking part in a time-honored women's ritual of passing on wisdom from one generation to another." Recalled
Dobard:
And then a Sunday morning in May I received a call, and Jackie
was speaking in something of a whispered voice, as if she were
almost afraid to ask the question. And she said "Raymond,
here’s what she said to me" - the code. And she followed by
saying "Have you heard of anything like this before? Does it
seem credible to you? Is this the real thing? And my response was
"Jackie, it’s a miracle. Yes, I think you’ve found what
we’ve all been hoping to find, and that’s a real code."
Dobard promptly agreed to coauthor. Within a day of finding an
agent, three publishers were bidding for the book. But while Dobard’s own Howard University Press would seem the most logical choice for an ostensibly scholarly work on African-American history, Tobin and Dobard signed with Doubleday, Random House’s middlebrow
subsidiary.
Ozella died in 1998, just a
few weeks after Tobin’s last meeting with her. Just eight months later (and as Ozella had predicted before her death), Dobard was promoting Hidden in Plain View on the Oprah Winfrey show. Although the book is
primarily Tobin's creation, when the Oprah Winfrey show and
other producers called to arrange for public appearances, it was
Dobard they wanted, not Tobin - - who was even passed over by Denver quilt guilds. According to Wahlman, "I think that's partly because he's
African-American, partly because he has a Ph.D. They think
he's the scholar, but she's the scholar." Tobin
was miffed, but said that Dobard "acted as though we've
got to do this to sell the book."
Tobin claimed Ozella's family "all corroborated the story, albeit in slightly different versions, gave me the same history of the story. Relatives from Ohio, Georgia and
California have confirmed the story their mother and grandmother told Ozella." But Ozella's niece, Teresa Kemp (who lives in Georgia), wrote me that the family only found out about the book by accident, after it was published. According to Kemp,
Tobin never contacted either her or her mother, who lives in Ohio.
After
Ozella's death the tourist market stall was rented by fiber artist
Anne Robinson, who recalls that when she first arrived a number of
the craft vendors
"...said 'Oh
another quilter again. We hadn't had one since Miss Ozella.' No
one mentioned the stories but when the book came out I started
selling it (quilt related you see) and they were shocked that
(a) there was a book at all and (b) that anyone believed her.
Apparently she was very free with the info that she was just
telling tales to sell quilts....According to them, she used to
make up the stories for the tourists and just laugh after they
left."
One of the
book's three introductions is written by Wahlman, without whose
book Signs and Symbols
Tobin claims Hidden in
Plain View "could not have been written".
Amazingly, Benberry wrote another, which was viewed
by some as a credibility coup for the authors. In it Benberry claimed Tobin and
Dobard "established a significant linkage between the
Underground Railroad, escaping slaves and the American patchwork
quilt." And shortly after the book's publication in 1999, Benberry predicted Ozella's "oral history" would "generate a great deal of controversy," which she
dismissed as coming from "the custom of scholars to look askance at oral tradition, at anything that can't be proved by the written word." In 2002, Benberry thought that giving Tobin credit for "her good intentions but not for [her] careful
research" was "most distressing and condescending". But a year later, she appears to have
stepped away from the book. The Cincinnati
Post reported in 2003:
[T]hree years and much
controversy later, Benberry won't vouch for the book's accuracy.
"I don't know," she said, when asked whether she
believed the story. "I'm still waiting for the weight of the
evidence to tip the scale one way or another."
Scholarship under fire
Less than 20% of
Hidden in Plain View actually discusses Ozella's "quilt code". Forewords, acknowledgements, authors' notes, an epilogue, a glossary, and a timeline of slavery take up 52
of the book's 208 pages. Its format alone makes a careful reading difficult: strangely for a nonfiction volume, the book has neither index nor footnotes, and lumps all its sources together in a 16-page bibliography. (Tobin explains that it "was written for the average, non quilter, not the quilt
historian.") The bibliography's length suggests extensive research; but of 159 works listed, the book actually cites only 33 - of which three are juvenile literature. In fact,
Hidden in Plain View's bibliography includes nine works written for
children; a novel about the Amistad rebellion; contemporary poetry; a
Whole Earth Magazine article on African-American music by a columnist who also writes on family therapy, the movie Titanic, and why children like
Xena Warrior Princess; and a
book claiming that the earth was populated by extraterrestrials.
It is difficult to draw a connection between the sources
Hidden in Plain View does cite and the conclusions at which it arrives. More than once, the sources
say nothing remotely like what Tobin and Dobard suggest; in other cases, the authors use a poorly-researched secondary source (which does support their claim) rather than referring to the original document
(which does not). Tobin admits that the book's photographs are "certainly of recently made quilts," but explains "there was not time to seek out antique quilts, nor were we trying
to be accurate as to the date of the quilt shown." When asked why the book contained a photograph of a 20th century quilt pattern, Tobin blamed the book's "graphics editor" - even though Dobard
himself had not only provided the photo, but made the quilt block himself.
The book's
poor scholarship was derided by historians from every discipline,
who noted its claims were contradicted by everything known about
quilts and the Underground Railroad. The only one to say
anything remotely positive takes great pains to avoid saying the
book's claims have any factual basis. Damning Hidden in Plain View
with
faint praise, Joseph Reidy (a colleague of Dobard) merely says it
"opens up new ways of thinking" about the Underground
Railroad and that he "appreciates" Dobard's attempt to
"mine [material culture] for...hidden meanings". Even
Dobard equivocates, stating that the book's claims are based on "informed conjecture." And he openly admits to turning accepted research methodology on its head:
We have thus found ourselves to be obliged to reverse conventional procedures, having to present a theory before finding a wealth of tangible evidence.
The "Quilt Code" gets its legs
But when Hidden in Plain View was
featured on Oprah Winfrey (to which only Dobard was invited, much to Tobin's irritation) and Ozella's relatives appeared on the
TV program Simply Quilts, it quickly became a part of the
pop culture already surrounding African-American quilts.
Eleanor Burns, a white publisher of quilt pattern books, issued
one for an "Underground Railroad Sampler". Quilt shop
owners marketed the book, quilt block kits, and classes based on
the "Quilt Code". White,
middle-income suburban quilters - some 95% of the multibillion-dollar
quilting market - frequently say the "Code" story makes them feel good. It is common to hear them confidently
assert - at a safe distance of 150 years - that had they lived
during slavery, they would have been conductors on the Underground
Railroad themselves.
By February 2000, the Code had morphed from Dobard's "informed conjecture" into unquestioned historic fact. The February 2000 issue of American Visions, a peer-reviewed arts journal, published
an excerpt of Hidden in Plain View, prefacing it with an introduction claiming that Ozella had actually shown Tobin
a quilt dating from
slavery that, she explained, bore markings that had guided runaway
slaves along the routes to freedom.
This quilt does not appear in
Hidden in Plain View; has never been mentioned by either Tobin, Dobard, Wilson, or Kemp; and could not be found in Kemp's Atlanta "museum". It appears to
be the figment of the journal editors' imagination.
School
systems desperate for an easy way to teach the complicated subject
of slavery added Sweet Clara and Ozella's "Quilt
Code" to their Social Studies curricula. Meanwhile
African-Americans' documented historic accomplishments - not to
mention actual stories of escape - were studiously ignored.
Some
in the rather ladylike quilt world suggested that questioning the
historical accuracy of the "Quilt Code" was too
upsetting, and perhaps not quite nice. Others argued that serious
historians knew the truth, and it didn’t matter what the average
American thought about how enslaved blacks escaped to freedom. In a strange twist of logic, many privately
expressed the fear that by challenging a new stereotype of
African-Americans, they’d be called racist. Others wondered
condescendingly whether African-Americans "just need
something to cling to" (an actual email this writer
received). No one, however, could explain what benefit to
blacks exists in promoting urban legend as historic fact.
In 2001, children's book writer Marcia Vaughan's
The Secret to Freedom was published. The book, which one review says is written in a "modified colloquial language that hints at the unschooled
plantation speech," tells the story of 10-year-old slave girl who is given a sack of quilts by her brother, a conductor on the Underground Railroad. At his instruction she displays the quilts to help slaves escape. The book won a Teachers' Choice
award; numerous guides are available so that teachers can use the book in classes about the Underground Railroad.
In May
2002, Traditional
Quiltworks magazine published an article by Ozella’s
niece, Serena Wilson, who after an apparent falling-out with Tobin
had gone on the nationwide lecture circuit herself. Her
article (pages 1-2, 3-4, 5)provided what she called "new information" on
the "Quilt Code", but in the process she often
contradicted her aunt Ozella. She also provided lecture booking
information and the location of her gift shop. For like Ozella,
Wilson had a business making and selling quilts.
In 2003,
Kentucky native Clarice Boswell published Lizzie's Story,
which the author claims is based on the life of her grandmother
(who was born five years after the Civil War ended) and who, says
Boswell, taught her the "Quilt Code". She lectures
nationwide promoting her book and her own, elaborate and
very different version of the "Code", but does not
permit her lectures to be recorded because, she
says, her story changes a little every time.
Also in
2003, Hopkinson published yet another "Quilt Code"
children's storybook, Under the Quilt of Night. It
contains an entirely different "code" from the one in
her earlier Sweet Clara. In 1997, she had queried members of the Quilt History email list on the factual accuracy of the claim that quilts were used as Underground Railroad signals. List members discouraged her from promoting what they said was a
myth; Hopkinson responded that her new book "will probably include a note indicating that this hasn't been proven or documented fully."
In 2004, Bettye
Stroud
joined the throng with her children's book The Patchwork Path:
A Quilt Map to Freedom. The book is described as
"fiction but includes a lot of facts". It contains yet
another version of the "Quilt Code".
That year Macia Fuller also joined the "Quilt Code" lecture circuit. A review of a book by another author quotes Fuller, describing her as an "arts curator and African history scholar from
Sacramento," but no other information on her has been located. Fuller claimed in a 2005 lecture that the earliest evidence "of African-Americans on the U.S. continent" dates from when "Africa and South America were connected" some 135
million years ago. (Scientists believe Homo sapiens first appeared 120,000 years ago.)
That fall, a Kingston, Ontario family constructed a " corn maze " (admission $6 adults), through which visitors are guided by a "quilt code".
In June 2005, the New York Times reported that residents of the central Long Island town of Stony Brook had started claiming the local Setalcott Indians had used their own "Quilt Code"
to help fugitive slaves escape:
The Morning Star pattern indicated help would come from a Native American, she said, and the color of an Hourglass indicated the time of day: red meant the morning, yellow or green the afternoon, blue or
black the evening. Mr. Green said his grandmother told him a zigzag pattern like the Drunkard's Path referred to winding routes, known only to Setalcotts and accessible only by canoe, through the swamps and wetlands along the North Shore.
In August 2005 the local Trotwood, Ohio paper announced that the
school board had commissioned a massive "Quilt Code" mural for the lobby of the region’s new high school, based on a book written by a former school board member. The school's cafeteria is
decorated with enormous "Quilt Code" blocks.
In late October 2005 a University of Nevada/Las Vegas professor asked H-Slavery listmembers for help on behalf of master’s degree candidate Theodore Ransaw, who was
writing his master’s thesis on the "Quilt Code" but had been unable to find any evidence it existed. Fifteen scholars told him there was no such evidence, and that the "Code" was myth. Ransaw then contacted me, admitting Wilson and Kemp’s
claims "seemed speculative." Less than six weeks later, he submitted his thesis, which unquestioningly accepts the
"Quilt Code’s" existence. Ransaw also accepts Kemp’s claim that she has an "authenticated first hand account" of the "Quilt Code," although he admits he has never seen it.
The
80-page document, which refers to Hidden in Plain View (one of his "most heavily used sources") as "Hidden in Plain Sight," is riddled with significant factual errors and fabricated statements relating directly to his claims. For more
on the Ransaw thesis, click here.
Not to be outdone by Ransaw or the Setalcotts, in February 2006 Wilson and Kemp's website began claiming that "Jewish
people used Quilts during the World War to let others know when Nazi presence made it dangerous to come and go." Severin Hochberg, senior historian at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Center for
Advanced Holocaust Studies, says there is no evidence quilts were ever used in this manner.
In 2006 the Times featured the "Code" again, announcing that a statue of Frederick Douglass being erected at the corner of Central Park and 8th
Avenues in New York would be embellished by sculptor Algernon Miller with images of "Code" quilt blocks.
By 2009, even Dobard
had backpedaled
on his earlier claims, admitting at one lecture that "[t]he
book is not infallible and there are mistakes in there." The
author of Hidden in Plain View now found his own book
something of a puzzle:
Asked where this
book should appear on the library shelf, non-fiction or fiction,
Dobard responded, "I think it should be in between, but
more in the non-fiction, because there are facts in here. There
are portions in this book that are definitely non-fiction, but
we don't know everything about Ozella — she's an enigmatic
figure and there are some enigmatic elements in the book. "
_____________________________
In his
introduction, Hidden in Plain View
co-author Dobard was careful to characterize Ozella's story as an
interesting theory needing further study. But until his 2009
interview, he, Tobin, and every other "Code" proponent has
presented it as historical fact.
Is
it?
At least fifteen different, contradictory "quilt code" claims are now
in circulation. And while several proponents assert the
"Code" was passed to them through family oral history,
none claims a single ancestor who actually escaped North; all
remained in the South. Quite remarkably, not a single woman who
ostensibly passed down the "Code" through her
descendants seems to have used it herself.
Those
genuinely interested in quilt history and the history of the
Underground Railroad must wonder which account - if any - is
accurate. Can any of these claims be supported by independent
sources? Do they stand the test of the National Parks Service's
own guidelines
for substantiating Underground Railroad claims?
Roland
Freeman,
founder of The Group for Cultural Documentation
and author of many books on African-American history including
A Communion of the Spirits: African-American Quilters,
Preservers, and Their Stories, has researched African-American
quilt history for decades. In a 2002 interview,
Freeman observed "There is a whole group of people who
wallow in the concept of how we got over, but I couldn't find
any evidence to support [a quilt "code"]." Like
Mr. Wright, Mr. Freeman wonders how such a "mass
conspiracy" could have existed without leaving behind
some evidence. He finds no evidence of a
"code" - something that the authors of Hidden in
Plain View fail to note when they mention his
book.
Historian
and acclaimed Harriet Tubman biographer Kate
Clifford Larson observed on afrigeneas.com,
a site devoted to African-American genealogy research,
that
by
dressing the story up all cute and pretty with quilt patterns
and kindly folks who used them to guide runaways to freedom -
then we don't have to talk about the realities of slavery, and
of running away, etc. It seems to me to be part and parcel of
the continued erasure of African American history - by
creating mythical stories the truth is eventually lost. No one
needs myths as a substitute for history, nor as a way to
explain the complications of history. There is plenty of the
real stuff out there, waiting to be exposed and taught to
everyone
Shelly Pearsall, who writes historical fiction for children, concurs:
[The "Quilt Code"] enables schools to keep from tackling the realities of the runaway slave experience. I think it also diminishes the incredible courage, guts, and individual determination the journey
required. There were no quilts -- there was hunger, there was fear, there was illness, there was bad weather, there was frequent misinformation and losing your way -- it was not a lovely journey of hopping from one quilt pattern to the next.
Faith Davis Ruffins is
a historian at the Smithsonian Institution and curator of an
exhibit at Cincinnati's National Underground Railroad Freedom
Center. In the same Cincinnati Post interview
quoting Benberry and Reidy, Ruffins says Hidden in Plain View is
"really a disservice" to Underground Railroad
history. She notes that neither Tobin nor Dobard seem to
have researched Ozella Williams's own background. According to
Ruffins, Hidden in Plain View is " made up of
speculation and supposition...There is a huge issue of
implausibility. There are no sources...They do not provide a
single shred of evidence that this is
true."
George
Nagle, editor of Afrolumens.org,
asserts that "This persistent fairy tale has been leading
researchers down false trails for too long. It's time to
debunk the myth and get on with serious research."
Author
Dobard brushes aside this skepticism as "irritating."
Sources
Thanks to
the firsthand accounts of slave life recorded during the WPA
Writers Project in the 1930s, and more than 200 published autobiographies
and diaries of former slaves and Underground Railroad participants
(half published before the Civil War, the rest afterward), we have
many detailed descriptions of escape and of quiltmaking - even a
list of the quilt blocks former slaves said were their favorites.
Harriet Tubman herself refers to quiltmaking; piecing quilt blocks
was this Underground Railroad conductor's favorite way to pass the
time while hiding in the woods, waiting for sundown when she could
guide her "passengers" to freedom. Larson's biography notes that Tubman gave a quilt (as payment or in gratitude,
we do not know) to the woman who hid her when she first escaped
from slavery. But none of the firsthand accounts of
slaves who actually escaped to freedom (unlike those said to have
used the "Code") mention any sort of "code"
using quilts. Ozella, her niece Serena Wilson - both in the
business of selling quilts to tourists - and children's book
writer Clarisse Boswell are the only source of this
information. And their accounts of the "Code"
directly contradict each other.
Research
on this subject included conversations with Wilson and
lengthy correspondence with Teresa Kemp, her daughter, who
also lectures on the "Quilt Code". I was
disappointed that although her ten emails to me in May 2002 totaled more than 3,000 words, and she
repeatedly stated that she wanted to answer in detail any questions I had, when I sent her specific regarding the
individual quilt blocks said to be included in the
"Code," Kemp’s emails to me abruptly
stopped.
In late
July 2004 Kemp again made contact with me, blaming a computer
virus for her two-year silence. Over a period of about 10
days she sent me another dozen emails
totaling another 3,000 words, none of which answered any of my
questions about the "quilt code". She did,
however, make a number of new claims, including that the Daughters
of the Confederacy are somehow behind objections to the
"quilt code" myth, and that historians reject the
"quilt code" because they "did not bother to check
or get other information".
As she did
in 2002, Kemp repeatedly promised to answer specific
questions I sent her about the "quilt code". She
even agreed to send me copies of the evidence she claims to have
unearthed. She never sent me anything, nor did she ever
reply to follow-up emails asking for their whereabouts. But while Kemp may have abandoned her correspondence with me, she
continues to send out notices of lectures and other appearances and applied for a Federal government grant to teach the "Code". In 2005 she announced she had opened a "museum" and gift shop in Atlanta, for
which she charges admission. It closed a few years
later.